원저

악하선 타석증의 임상적 특성과 수술적 치료 결과

장연일1, 유병준1, 윤희수1, 송창면1, 지용배1, 태경1,*
Youn Il Jang1, Byung Joon Yoo1, Hee Soo Yoon1, Chang Myeon Song1, Yong Bae Ji1, Kyung Tae1,*
Author Information & Copyright
1한양대학교 의과대학 이비인후-두경부외과학교실
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
*교신저자: 태 경, 04763 서울 성동구 왕십리로 222 한양대학교 의과대학 이 비 인후-두경 부외과학교실 전화: (02) 2290-8585· 전송: (02) 2293-3335 E-mail: kytae@hanyang.ac.kr

© Copyright 2017 The Busan, Ulsan, Gyeoungnam Branch of Korean Society of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Sep 29, 2017; Revised: Oct 25, 2017; Accepted: Nov 24, 2017

Published Online: May 31, 2020

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: Submandibular sialolithiasis is one of common otolaryngologic diseases. Stones located in the distal portion of Wharton’s duct can be easily removed by intraoral approach. Hilar stone was removed traditionally by excision of submandibular gland. However, intraoral removal of hilar stone or stone of proximal portion of Wharton’s duct has increased recently. In this study, we evaluated clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of submandibular sialolithiasis according to surgical approach and the location of stone. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with submandibular sialolithiasis who had undergone surgical treatment from January 2006 to April 2016. We classified stones into 5 groups according to the location (distal, middle, proximal, hilar, and intraparenchymal). We investigated patient demographics, size of stone, number of stone, complications, surgical approach (intraoral vs. external approach), and recurrence. Results: Patients with submandibular sialolithiasis presented with submandibular swelling (65.7%) or pain (11.9%). Sialoliths were located mainly at the distal portion (44.7%) and hilar portion of Wharton’s duct (36.9%). Most hilar stones were removed intraorally(82.4%). Complication rate was not different between the intraoral approach group (4.7%) and the external approach group (4.5%) in hilar and proximal stones. Recurrence occurred in 7 cases (1.8%), and recurrence was significantly correlated with multiplicity of stone (p=0.04). Conclusions? Submandibular sialoliths were mainly located at distal and hilar portion of Wharton’s duct. Recurrence after surgical removal is relatively low, and multiple stone is associated with recurrence. (J Clinical Otolaryngol 2017;28:199–204)

Keywords: 타석증; 악하선; 하악선관; 타석
Keywords: Sialolithiasis; Submandibular gland; Wharton’s duct; Salivary stone