원저

코성형술에 있어서 두개골계측영상의 유용성

최소영1, 송커다모2, 이호윤2, 장동식2, 김아영1, 최명수2,*
So Young Choi1, Ku Da Mo Song2, Ho Yun Lee2, Dong Sik Chang2, Ah-Young Kim1, Myoung Su Choi2,*
Author Information & Copyright
1을지대학교 의과대학 영상의학교실
2이비인후과학교실
1Department of Radiology, Eulji University Medical Center, College of Medicine, Eulji University, Daejeon, Korea
2Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Eulji University Medical Center, College of Medicine, Eulji University, Daejeon, Korea
*교신저자: 최명수, 35233 대전광역시 서구 둔산서로 95 을지대 학교 의과대학 이비인후과학교실 전화: (042) 611-3129·전송: (042) 611-3136 E-mail: mschoi@eulji.ac.kr

© Copyright 2016 The Busan, Ulsan, Gyeoungnam Branch of Korean Society of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jun 21, 2016; Revised: Sep 05, 2016; Accepted: Nov 08, 2016

Published Online: May 31, 2020

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: The photographic documentation of the rhinoplasty is important for analysis but it often yields different length depending on the angle or inclination of the object. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of the lateral cephalometric analysis for measuring of a nasal tip projection and rotation. Subjects and Method: Retrospectively, nasal tip projection and nasal tip rotation were measured by real-measurement and lateral cephalometry. Totally, 24 patients who were scheduled for rhinoplasty from March 2015 through February 2016 were enrolled. The difference of the nasal tip projection and rotation by real-measurement and lateral cephalometry was analyzed using the paired t-test. Results: The average of nasal tip projection was 25.1 ± 2.22 mm in the lateral cephalometry group and was 25.1 ± 1.94 mm in the real-measurement group. The difference of nasal tip projection was not significantly different between the lateral cephalometry and real measurement group (p=0.925). Nasal tip rotation was significantly lower in the cephalometry group (85.9° ± 10.7°) than in the real measurement group (90.8°± 10.2°) (p<0.001). Conclusions: Lateral cephalometric analysis may suggest reliable nasal tip projection in rhinoplasty. (J Clinical Otolaryngol 2016;27:275–280)

Keywords: 코성형; 두개골계측; 사진
Keywords: Cephalometry; Photography; Rhinoplasty