원저

수련 병원 이비인후과에서의 코성형 실태 조사

민병억1, 주형로1, 박찬흠1,*, 전진형1, 김덕영1, 정기남1, 홍성주1
Byoung Yuk Min1, Hyung Ro Chu1, Chan Hum Park1,*, Jin Hyoung Chun1, Duk Young Kim1, Ki Nam Jung1, Sung Ju Hong1
Author Information & Copyright
1한림대학교 의과대학 이비인후-두경부외과학교실
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea
*교신저자: 박찬흠, 200-704 강원도 춘천시 교동 153 한림대학교 의과대학 이비인후-두경부외과학교실 전화: (033) 252-9970·전송: (033) 241-2909 E-mail: hlpch@lycos.co.kr

© Copyright 2004 The Busan, Ulsan, Gyeoungnam Branch of Korean Society of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Sep 13, 2004; Accepted: Nov 15, 2004

Published Online: May 31, 2020

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: In doing rhinoplasty as otolaryngologists in Korea surgeons are often faced with many difficulties such as low social announcement, learning new methods, detailed problems in selection of graft material etc. The purpose of this study is to investigate the current status of rhinoplasty in ENT department of university hospitals and other resident-training hospitals. Materials and Methods: Seventeen doctors operating rhinoplasty were received 23 questions via an e-mail which contains questions about current clinical practice patterns such as years of surgeon’s experience, relationship between ENT department and other department, difficulties in gathering patients, distributions of rhinoplasty patients visiting ENT clinics, cases of patient’s visit and graft materials. Each reply was analyzed and classified. Results: More rhinoplasties were performed in ENT department than any other department among 8 in 17 hospitals responding in this study, without much conflict with other departments. Accroding to the survey, low social announcement, difficulties of learning more advanced technique and the stress for complications and outcomes were described as hardship. Lots of patients had coproblems in cosmetic and intranasal origin. Most of reply pointed out that supports of otorhinolaryngology society were needed for general announcement and establishment of subdivision and proper fund. Conclusion: More supports and systemic efforts from the rhinology society are needed for in terms of public relations and academic development. (J Clinical Otolaryngol 2004;15:222–226)

Keywords: 비성형술; 실태조사
Keywords: Rhinoplasty; Clinical practice patterns